Absence of Traceability The Effectiveness of Most coordination difficult. This is seen with the sanitary controls entrusted to the States, and for which the governors have a margin of interpretation of the decisions taken at the central level. This is also true of the preparation of legislative texts, which comes under a myriad of separate administrations. For example, APHIS is responsible for animal health in the Department of Agriculture
USDA credit requirement but FSIS is responsible for meat inspection in slaughterhouses. While under USDA supervision, these two organizations are autonomous. The Another pillar of food safety is the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It is under the authority of Health, and does not deal with meat, for which the USDA is responsible. For fish, at the origin of many intoxications, it is still another agency that takes care of controls. The disadvantages of this break-up are real and Washington is considering merging the different instances. But the project comes up against strong union opposition. The disadvantages of this break-up are real and Washington is considering merging the different instances. But the project comes up against strong union opposition. The disadvantages of this break-up are real and Washington is considering merging the different instances. But the project comes up against strong union opposition.
For all these reasons, it is hard to imagine that the United States is introducing the so-called “fork-to-fork” principle, which has become inevitable on the Old Continent after the mad cow crisis and health scandals such as the dioxin scandal.
Across the Atlantic, the ‘ administration does not operate health surveillance farms, making it impossible to trace. Controllers can only practice their profession from slaughterhouses, say European veterinarians. Failure to control microbism before this stage forces Americans to water the carcasses with antiseptic products. A practice prohibited in Europe for reasons of taste alteration, because the chlorine is fixed on proteins.
Criticized in the eyes of Europeans, especially French, US policy is first dictated by economic motives. The multiplication of controls undoubtedly weighs on the competitiveness of the products of the old Europe, while the absence of health surveillance gives American commodities a considerable advantage, from 15% to 20%, according to veterinary studies. Growth promoters, hormones or antibiotics, are another source of substantial gains, estimated at 6%. They are one of the major litigation issues with the European Union, where these substances are outlawed. Never stop! Things are starting to change in the United States under pressure from consumer associations. For example, McDonald’s has negotiated with some suppliers, including giant Tyson, that they stop selling use antibiotics as growth promoters and reduce their use of veterinary drugs. The FDA has welcomed the initiative as it is likely to curb the very disturbing phenomenon of antibiotic resistance.
In recent months, negotiations around 1% are multiplying.
The time is always in the balances on the front of the mortgage.